Difference between revisions of "File talk:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (reply) |
(File: & Document: Namespaces) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is unusual in being the subject of another document, so it would make a good test case for a checking and revising how SMW deals with documents. If the document about this one doesn't appear, it'll likely be because of the "File:" prefix confusing the code. Currently, the WS SMW code is slightly inconsistent in how it deals with this, so it could use some rationalization. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:42, 3 July 2015 (IST) | This is unusual in being the subject of another document, so it would make a good test case for a checking and revising how SMW deals with documents. If the document about this one doesn't appear, it'll likely be because of the "File:" prefix confusing the code. Currently, the WS SMW code is slightly inconsistent in how it deals with this, so it could use some rationalization. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:42, 3 July 2015 (IST) | ||
:It is an interesting one and highligts the issue of having used the 'Document' namespace initially to define a Document; then revising that definition such that Files are also included. There is still much scope for confusion and it does make the matter of auto-assigning the right form problematical. The [[:File:Analysis of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X.pdf|analysis pdf]] is a candidate for transcription to a regular document with a link to its pdf. I think I'll try and get that done. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 06:29, 3 July 2015 (IST) | :It is an interesting one and highligts the issue of having used the 'Document' namespace initially to define a Document; then revising that definition such that Files are also included. There is still much scope for confusion and it does make the matter of auto-assigning the right form problematical. The [[:File:Analysis of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X.pdf|analysis pdf]] is a candidate for transcription to a regular document with a link to its pdf. I think I'll try and get that done. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 06:29, 3 July 2015 (IST) | ||
| + | ::Yeah, FWIW, I actually like the old idea of {{NS|File}} for static (untouched) files, and {{NS|Document}} for wikitext versions - provided we can somehow keep a close correspondence between the two. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 07:42, 3 July 2015 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:42, 3 July 2015
SMW and Documents
This is unusual in being the subject of another document, so it would make a good test case for a checking and revising how SMW deals with documents. If the document about this one doesn't appear, it'll likely be because of the "File:" prefix confusing the code. Currently, the WS SMW code is slightly inconsistent in how it deals with this, so it could use some rationalization. Robin (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2015 (IST)
- It is an interesting one and highligts the issue of having used the 'Document' namespace initially to define a Document; then revising that definition such that Files are also included. There is still much scope for confusion and it does make the matter of auto-assigning the right form problematical. The analysis pdf is a candidate for transcription to a regular document with a link to its pdf. I think I'll try and get that done. --Peter P (talk) 06:29, 3 July 2015 (IST)
