Difference between revisions of "File:Analysis of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Robin (talk) to last revision by Peter)
m (Text replacement - "[[Wikispooks:" to "[[Project:")
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|type=analysis
 
|type=analysis
 
|description=An intelligence analysis and authentication of the un-redacted portions of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X - Project Babylon: The Iraq supergun (1991)
 
|description=An intelligence analysis and authentication of the un-redacted portions of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X - Project Babylon: The Iraq supergun (1991)
|typeDraft=No
+
|draft=No
 
|collection=No
 
|collection=No
 
|authors=Martin Tancock
 
|authors=Martin Tancock
 
|subjects=File:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf,
 
|subjects=File:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf,
 
|source_name=JANCOM
 
|source_name=JANCOM
|comment=This paper makes a persuasive case for the authenticity of the ''unredacted'' CIA report on the so called ''[[Supergun|Iraq supergun]]'' affair. It speculates that its source is the [[Mossad]] which was provided with an ''[[:File:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf|unredacted copy]]'' at the time of its production in 1991. It analyses the intricacies of [[Mossad]]/[[CIA]] relationships and tensions since that time and summarises the reasons why [[Gerald Bull]] had become such an urgent and serious threat to Deep-State operative in Margaret Thatcher's Britain. The fact that [[Mossad]] responsibility for Gerald Bull's murder would clearly become such an obvious public assumption, presented his killers with excellent cover. That this has been the leitmotive of practically all {{ccm}} commentary about the killing ever since, is sufficient of call it into serious question under [[Wikispooks:Editorial Policy|Wikispooks' editorial policy]] and guidlines.
+
|comment=This paper makes a persuasive case for the authenticity of the ''unredacted'' CIA report on the so called ''[[Supergun|Iraq supergun]]'' affair. It speculates that its source is the [[Mossad]] which was provided with an ''[[:File:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf|unredacted copy]]'' at the time of its production in 1991. It analyses the intricacies of [[Mossad]]/[[MI6]] relationships and tensions since that time and summarises the reasons why [[Gerald Bull]] had become such an urgent and serious threat to Deep-State operatives in Margaret Thatcher's Britain. The fact that [[Mossad]] responsibility for Gerald Bull's murder would clearly become the dominant public assumption, presented his killers with excellent cover. That this has been the leitmotive of practically all {{ccm}} commentary about the killing ever since, is sufficient to call it into serious question under [[Project:Editorial Policy|Wikispooks' editorial policy]] and guidlines.
 +
|note=The subject of this analysis is the CIA report detailed in "Subjects"
 
|leaked=No
 
|leaked=No
 
|declassified=No
 
|declassified=No

Revision as of 16:02, 3 January 2016

An intelligence analysis and authentication of the un-redacted portions of CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X - Project Babylon: The Iraq supergun (1991)

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png analysis  by Martin Tancock dated 2013
Subjects: File:CIA Research Paper SW91-100076X un-redacted.pdf
Source: JANCOM

The subject of this analysis is the CIA report detailed in "Subjects"

Wikispooks Comment
This paper makes a persuasive case for the authenticity of the unredacted CIA report on the so called Iraq supergun affair. It speculates that its source is the Mossad which was provided with an unredacted copy at the time of its production in 1991. It analyses the intricacies of Mossad/MI6 relationships and tensions since that time and summarises the reasons why Gerald Bull had become such an urgent and serious threat to Deep-State operatives in Margaret Thatcher's Britain. The fact that Mossad responsibility for Gerald Bull's murder would clearly become the dominant public assumption, presented his killers with excellent cover. That this has been the leitmotive of practically all commercially-controlled media commentary about the killing ever since, is sufficient to call it into serious question under Wikispooks' editorial policy and guidlines.

★ Start a Discussion about this document



File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current18:18, 29 June 2015 (255 KB)Peter (talk | contribs)testing local upload extension Category:Jancom
  • You cannot overwrite this file.