Difference between revisions of "Jeffrey Epstein/Affair"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Dershowitz image)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==First exposure==
 
==First exposure==
 +
[[image:Jeffrey Epstein and his attorney Alan Dershowitz.jpg|[[Jeffrey Epstein]] and his attorney [[Alan Dershowitz]]|thumb|420px]]
 
In 2008 Epstein arranged a plea deal after being arrested for soliciting a minor for sexual contact. His defense lawyers [[Jay Lefkowitz‎]] (and [[Alan Dershowitz]]?{{cn}}) agreed a deal with [[Alexander Acosta]] which gave a blanket exemption to any associates of Epstein in the affair.  
 
In 2008 Epstein arranged a plea deal after being arrested for soliciting a minor for sexual contact. His defense lawyers [[Jay Lefkowitz‎]] (and [[Alan Dershowitz]]?{{cn}}) agreed a deal with [[Alexander Acosta]] which gave a blanket exemption to any associates of Epstein in the affair.  
  
Line 23: Line 24:
  
 
==2019 Arrest==
 
==2019 Arrest==
 +
Epstein was arrested on 6 July 2019 and charged with of [[sex trafficking]] offences.
  
 
==="Suicide attempt"===
 
==="Suicide attempt"===

Revision as of 06:40, 15 August 2019

Event.png Jeffrey Epstein/Affair(Deep event) Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Jeffrey Epstein Affair.jpg
Exposed byJohn Dougan
Interest ofNick Bryant, MintPress News, Amazing Polly, Loretta Preska, Larry Sanger, Conchita Sarnoff, The Last American Vagabond, Whitney Webb

The Epstein Affair is centered upon the figure of Jeffrey Epstein, but involves large swathes of associates whose role continues to be minimised by commercially-controlled media.

Background

Jeffrey Epstein was set up as a billionaire financier. A paedophilic sex-addict himself, he hosted lavish parties and arranged for sexual blackmail. Unconfirmed rumours suggest that he was employed by the Mossad.

First exposure

In 2008 Epstein arranged a plea deal after being arrested for soliciting a minor for sexual contact. His defense lawyers Jay Lefkowitz‎ (and Alan Dershowitz?[citation needed]) agreed a deal with Alexander Acosta which gave a blanket exemption to any associates of Epstein in the affair.

2019 Ruling

In February 2019 "a federal judge ruled that the prosecutors working the case broke the law by not notifying Epstein's victims that they were cutting him a plea deal."[1]

After this, former associates moved to distance themselves from Epstein.[citation needed]

2019 Arrest

Epstein was arrested on 6 July 2019 and charged with of sex trafficking offences.

"Suicide attempt"

"Apparent Suicide"

Many (most?) commercially-controlled media outlets hurried to echo the official narrative of an "apparent suicide", without detailing what circumstances gave the appearance of suicide. This was in sharp contrast with independent voices which tended to express high levels of disbelief at the suicide narrative.


 

Related Quotations

PageQuoteAuthorDate
2021“If powerful males having sex with underage girls is not a problem—if there’s no need to identify & prosecute them—then why hold #GhislaineMaxwell responsible for trafficking? If her actions were reprehensible, then what’s the excuse for not punishing the other criminals involved?”Dinesh D'SouzaDecember 2021
2023“Former V.I. Attorney General Denise George, who successfully sued the estate of Jeffrey Epstein and then was summarily fired by Gov. Albert Bryan Jr. in December, has broken her silence in an interview with Britain’s Sunday Times Magazine. In it, she hints that a run for governor may be in her future.

The interview — published Saturday by the Sunday Times, a 600,000-plus circulation newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. — is the first time George has spoken of her efforts to bring Epstein and his alleged accomplices to account, and the fallout from that endeavor. George, who was widely lauded when she won a $105 million lawsuit against the Epstein estate in November — believed to be the largest monetary settlement in the history of the territory — subsequently filed suit for $190 million against his onetime bank, JPMorgan Chase, on Dec. 27 in Manhattan federal court, alleging violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

Bryan fired George four days later, on New Year’s Eve, saying nothing at first but later admitting that he was “blindsided” by the lawsuit that has opened V.I. officials to scrutiny for their dealings with Epstein. That includes Bryan himself, who approved Epstein’s lucrative Economic Development Authority benefits when he was head of the EDA board and has been deposed by JPMorgan’s attorneys, along with a host of other territory officials.”
Sian CobbSeptember 2023
Alexander Acosta“I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone”Alexander Acosta
Joseph Recarey“There were really just two people willing to risk their careers to go after Epstein: Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Detective Joseph Recarey... In their first media interviews about the case, Reiter and Recarey revealed new details about the investigation, and how they were, in their view, pressured by then-Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer to downgrade the case to a misdemeanor or drop it altogether.”Julie Brown
Joseph Recarey
3 December 2018
Whitney Webb“Epstein was involved in a lot of things, and not only with underage females. Delving into all the publicly available material on Epstein, investigative journalist Whitney Webb needed two volumes to trace Epstein’s complex and mysterious career. She meticulously reconstructs the elaborate nebula of his connections to the world not just of finance, but also of espionage and crime. Her two volumes were published last year with the title, “One Nation Under Blackmail.”

Given all the chatter the WSJ’s articles have generated, at breakfast this morning I thought it appropriate to raise the question not so much of Epstein’s story itself, but of the way the press responds to the public’s need for information. After reminding Chad of the context, I shared these thoughts with Chad.

“The Journal appears to confirm, though only partially and obliquely, much of what Webb has described. Because of the implications — including the inevitable embarassment for people who have carefully crafted their public image of respectability — the Journal should either release the documents or, as Wikileaks was wont to do, share them with a number of serious newspapers to ensure a minimum level of objectivity and transparency. This story and all its implications are of vital interest to the public in a democracy. What, apart from the commercial interest of owning a scoop, explains the Wall Street Journal’s reluctance to do so?””
Whitney Webb
Peter Isackson
May 2023
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.