Difference between revisions of "Elizabeth Windsor"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Fixing quote)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|name=Elizabeth Windsor
 
|name=Elizabeth Windsor
 
|image=Elizabeth Windsor.jpg
 
|image=Elizabeth Windsor.jpg
 +
|modernhistoryproject=https://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Entity=Elizabeth2
 
|twitter=https://twitter.com/BritishMonarchy
 
|twitter=https://twitter.com/BritishMonarchy
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II
Line 14: Line 15:
 
Explaining [[patriotism]], the [[BBC]] published in 2014 that:
 
Explaining [[patriotism]], the [[BBC]] published in 2014 that:
 
{{QB| To love so indiscriminately is to love not at all, so instead we invest the idea of sovereignty - which in turn, is sort of idealisation of the national will - in an individual. In [[Britain]] this individual is the [[Queen]] - or rather, it is an idealisation of who she is, decoupled from the living, breathing, perspiring and micturating reality. This Queen is unfailingly wise, calm, pacific - a true mother of the nation. And if [[UK|her government]] happens to do things that are at variance with her goodliness, that is only because their power is contingent upon an evanescent electoral mandate, while her shadow-power-play is founded upon time-out-of-mind heredity - and at least residually, upon the Lord's will. Naturally, patriotic Britons are reluctant to admit to all of this, preferring to be seen as modern and up-to-date, but if they examine their [[conscience]]s carefully I think they will concede that a discrete love-of-country object is required for full patriotic attachment.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28468039</ref>}}
 
{{QB| To love so indiscriminately is to love not at all, so instead we invest the idea of sovereignty - which in turn, is sort of idealisation of the national will - in an individual. In [[Britain]] this individual is the [[Queen]] - or rather, it is an idealisation of who she is, decoupled from the living, breathing, perspiring and micturating reality. This Queen is unfailingly wise, calm, pacific - a true mother of the nation. And if [[UK|her government]] happens to do things that are at variance with her goodliness, that is only because their power is contingent upon an evanescent electoral mandate, while her shadow-power-play is founded upon time-out-of-mind heredity - and at least residually, upon the Lord's will. Naturally, patriotic Britons are reluctant to admit to all of this, preferring to be seen as modern and up-to-date, but if they examine their [[conscience]]s carefully I think they will concede that a discrete love-of-country object is required for full patriotic attachment.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28468039</ref>}}
 +
 
==Concerns==
 
==Concerns==
Indicted by [[Kevin Annett]] on February 25, 2013 for perpetrating or concealing the [[Canadian genocide]].  
+
[[Kevin Annett]] indicted Elizabeth Windsor on February 25, 2013 for perpetrating or concealing the [[Canadian genocide]].  
 +
 
 +
==Opinions==
 +
{{SMWQ
 +
|text=As far as I could make out it was quite harmless. It was very quick, and I've had lots of letters from people who have been very surprised by how easy it was to get [[COVID-19/Vaccine|the vaccine]]. And the jab - it didn't hurt at all. I think the other thing is, that it is obviously difficult for people if they've never had a vaccine, but they ought to think about other people rather than themselves.
 +
|subjects=COVID-19/Vaccine
 +
|date=2021
 +
|source_URL=https://news.yahoo.com/queen-urged-everyone-covid-19-142509092.html}}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{{SMWQ
 +
|subjects=UK/Deep State, Princess Diana, UK
 +
|text=There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge
 +
|source_name=Paul Burrell, The Guardian
 +
|source_URL=https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwitwIqF7bHwAhVL6qQKHbbNCnsQFjACegQIAhAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fuk%2F2002%2Fnov%2F06%2Fconstitution.monarchy1&usg=AOvVaw165L2qcksCEEQjBniPeUZw
 +
|align=left
 +
|date=2002
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
 
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
{{Stub}}
+
==References==
 +
{{Reflist}}

Latest revision as of 05:54, 5 May 2021

"Queen"
Person.png Elizabeth Windsor   ModernHistoryProject TwitterRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Elizabeth Windsor.jpg
Born21 April 1926
Mayfair, London, United Kingdom
ReligionChurch of England
SpousePrince Philip
Member ofChatham House/Governance, Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, The Pilgrims Society

Official narrative

Explaining patriotism, the BBC published in 2014 that:

To love so indiscriminately is to love not at all, so instead we invest the idea of sovereignty - which in turn, is sort of idealisation of the national will - in an individual. In Britain this individual is the Queen - or rather, it is an idealisation of who she is, decoupled from the living, breathing, perspiring and micturating reality. This Queen is unfailingly wise, calm, pacific - a true mother of the nation. And if her government happens to do things that are at variance with her goodliness, that is only because their power is contingent upon an evanescent electoral mandate, while her shadow-power-play is founded upon time-out-of-mind heredity - and at least residually, upon the Lord's will. Naturally, patriotic Britons are reluctant to admit to all of this, preferring to be seen as modern and up-to-date, but if they examine their consciences carefully I think they will concede that a discrete love-of-country object is required for full patriotic attachment.[1]

Concerns

Kevin Annett indicted Elizabeth Windsor on February 25, 2013 for perpetrating or concealing the Canadian genocide.

Opinions

“As far as I could make out it was quite harmless. It was very quick, and I've had lots of letters from people who have been very surprised by how easy it was to get the vaccine. And the jab - it didn't hurt at all. I think the other thing is, that it is obviously difficult for people if they've never had a vaccine, but they ought to think about other people rather than themselves.”
Elizabeth Windsor (2021)  [2]


“There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge”
Elizabeth Windsor (2002)  [3]


95 pounds thermometer.png
As of 2 June 2021, our 18 Patrons are giving £95/month, which is 95% of our webhosting bill. If you appreciate our efforts, please help keep this site running by donating or spreading the word about our Patreon page.


References