Document talk:Bob Ainsworth on the subject of the melted cavalry man

From Wikispooks
Revision as of 14:23, 15 September 2014 by Peter (talk | contribs) (new topic)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Relevance to Wikispooks

A personal view FWIW: I can't see much relevance to the Wikispooks project in this article. It's of a style, content and standard that is readily on display by the average raconteur regular in the average saloon bar. I used to follow Guido Fawkes myself, but the guy, whilst talented, is frankly little different from any other young(ish) intelligent Westminster village insider out to make a name for himself. He views the world through the eyes of an (ex-but-still-by-temperament-and-outlook) financial securities trader. As such, his world view is somewhat restricted and apart from the odd whistleblower-type revelation, I doubt his output will be of much relevance or interest to WS. Similar considerations apply to this guy (one of his contributors) IMHO.

Also, please, when posting a new article, consider it's relevance carefully and be sure to give it one or more subjects which should either be already created WS pages or ones which you judge should be created. Also, please use Form:Document and take the time to understand and complete the basic info and free-wikitext tab fields correctly. In particular, a brief description of the document MUST be supplied; it should be assigned a publication date (that's the original one); an author; a source; and a link to the source - all in the fields assigned for that purpose. --Peter P (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2014 (IST)