Difference between revisions of "Defense Information Systems Agency"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added: headquarters, predecessors, leader, num_staff.) |
m (Text replacement - "|leader=" to "|leaders=") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|headquarters=Naval Support Facility Anacostia, Washington, D.C | |headquarters=Naval Support Facility Anacostia, Washington, D.C | ||
|predecessors=White House Signal Detachment, White House Army Signal Agency, Defense Communications Agency | |predecessors=White House Signal Detachment, White House Army Signal Agency, Defense Communications Agency | ||
| − | | | + | |leaders=USAF |
|num_staff=501-1000 | |num_staff=501-1000 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 16 April 2016
 Defense Information Systems Agency    | |
|---|---|
| Predecessor | • White House Signal Detachment • White House Army Signal Agency • Defense Communications Agency |
| Parent organization | US/Department/Defense |
| Headquarters | Naval Support Facility Anacostia, Washington, D.C |
| Leader | USAF |
| Subgroups | White House Communications Agency |
| Staff | 501-1,000 |
Manages the Defense Information Systems Network
Official narrative
"Information superiority in defense of our Nation [i.e. the USA]."
Problems
Can an insistence on 'superiority' equate to defence? Presumably in the same way the "war department" became the "defense department" and "aggressive" became a laudatory adjective.[1]
The Wikipedia article[2] has been described as not "a bit pro-DISA", it's a freakin' press release!="[3].
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ http://www.robinupton.com/research/publications/How%20%27Aggressive%27%20became%20the%20new%20%27Professional%27%20(Robin%20Upton).pdf
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Information_Systems_Network
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Defense_Information_Systems_Agency&oldid=583251193
