Difference between revisions of "Cyberwarfare"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (expansion)
(rewording)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
==5D==
 
==5D==
The objectives in cyberwar usually include one of the “5 Ds”: deny, degrade, disrupt, deceive, or destroy.<ref>https://www.wired.com/beyond-the-beyond/2019/04/deny-degrade-disrupt-deceive-destroy/</ref>
+
The objectives in cyberwar usually include one or more of the “5 Ds”: deny, degrade, disrupt, deceive, or destroy.<ref>https://www.wired.com/beyond-the-beyond/2019/04/deny-degrade-disrupt-deceive-destroy/</ref>
  
 
===Information operations===
 
===Information operations===

Revision as of 22:53, 10 July 2020

Concept.png "Cyberwarfare" 
(plastic word)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Cyberwarfare.jpg
Interest of• Association of Old Crows
• Below Gotham Labs
• Fred Chang
• George Eliason
• Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace
• Joel Harding
• Chris Quick
• Rian van Rijbroek
• The 77th Brigade

Not to be confused with "cyberterrorism", which is a behaviour of non-state "terrorists".

Cyberwarfare is a plastic word used to promote fear uncertainty and doubt. It generally involves the hacking of enemy computer systems and networks, but since the rise of social media has an added information or propaganda element to influence foreign audiences, and affect adversary and enemy decisionmaking.[1] The formation of groups like The 77th Brigade and Integrity Initiative, however, attest to the fact that any and all audiences are a target.

5D

The objectives in cyberwar usually include one or more of the “5 Ds”: deny, degrade, disrupt, deceive, or destroy.[2]

Information operations

Information operations (IO), or Inform and Influence Activities are closely linked to Cyberwar. Sometimes these are having overlap with Psyops. IO is defined by the US military as “the integrated employment, during military operations, of information-related capabilities in concert with other lines of operation to influence, disrupt, corrupt, or usurp the decision-making of adversaries and potential adversaries while protecting our own.” This could mean among other things: spreading of false information, impersonation, denying network access (Internet/local) and destruction of hardware. The former two more are in the range of IO, the later two in the range of cyber attacks/war.[3] In other words, "IO can be performed in any domain, including cyberspace. An airplane dropping leaflets with a message aimed to influence an audience is conducting IO (psychological ops) without using cyberspace. Similarly, operations in cyberspace are not limited to IO. Manipulating an enemy airport computer system to disable the fuel pumps is a cyberspace operation, but not an example of IO".[4]

GCHQ in schools

In 2020 Matt Kennard for Declassified UK reported that GCHQ tries to recruit school children from the age of four years and up,[5] offering lessons on how to hack passwords and vulnerable machines, and how to spy on other children’s wifi traffic. The Cyber Schools Hub programme was set up in 2017 and “seeks to give young students the space and the opportunity to excel and explode into the market of cyber security and innovation”.[6]

Purposes

Bill Blunden opines that "the gilded hyperbole of Cyberwar being peddled to the public is dangerous because it distracts us from focusing on actual threats and constructive solutions."[7]


 

Examples

Page nameDescription
HBGaryCompany that developed sophisticated software for the control of sock puppets.
Russia/Cyberwarfare
StuxnetA production of the NSA and Unit 8200, designed to sabotage Iranian efforts to develop nuclear weapons.

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthor
Matthijs Veenendaal“Trust is a key foundation of a well-functioning society. Without reliable communication, organizations cannot operate effciently, be they corporations or government institutions. Malicious actors are aiming to exploit vulnerabilities in communication flows. With the advent

of new technology, it is possible for adversaries to impersonate leaders and create false impressions among population.

The Tallinn based NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence will organize a session focusing on questions including: What is at stake? What can nations do to enhance and protect trust in democratic institutions? Or is it already too late?”
Matthijs Veenendaal

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:CyberGuardian Cyber Security Education Programme for Children and Young Peoplebrainwashing concept paper30 January 2016Integrity InitiativeII puts lots of thought into how the military can train British children for cyberwarfare.
Document:Executive Summary Cyber Security Education Programme for Children and Young Peoplebrainwashing concept paper executive summary26 February 2016Integrity InitiativeII sums up its thought on how the military can train British children for cyberwarfare
Document:The Terrorists Among US- Traitors and Terror 3article21 June 2019George Eliason
Michael Jasinski
George Eliason interviews professor Michael Jasinski about the dire effects of outsourcing intelligence gathering and information dissemination.
File:Manufactured consent and cyberwar.pdfConference ProceedingsJune 2010Bill Blunden
File:US Psychological Warfare in Ukraine Targeting Online Independent Media Coverage.pdfarticle20 March 2015George EliasonCyberwarfare operations are getting targeted at anyone.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References