Difference between revisions of "CCTV"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(better on ON flaw)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
CCTV is originally about monitoring people ''for their own sake''. Crime prevention is a  
+
CCTV is originally about monitoring people ''for their own sake''. Crime prevention is a key driver behind the implementation of CCTV cameras.
  
==Justification==
+
===Problems===
The introduction is often justified with vague claims about crime prevention, though evidence on the actual impact of CCTV in this regard is lacking.
+
The "the total failure of CCTV to deter people from committing crimes in the first place"<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/17/why-cctv-does-not-deter-crime</ref> has not deterred the ever wider deployment of CCTV, suggesting that other motives might be driving this technological roll out.
  
 
==Control==
 
==Control==
Line 22: Line 22:
 
* 2005: [[7 July 2005 London bombings]] - [[Verint systems]] took control of [[London Transport]]'s CCTV 10 months before the attacks, and have never released any footage, claiming that none of the relevant cameras were working. Some frames from station CCTV cameras have been released, which show the alleged bombers, although their authenticity and relevance is disputed.
 
* 2005: [[7 July 2005 London bombings]] - [[Verint systems]] took control of [[London Transport]]'s CCTV 10 months before the attacks, and have never released any footage, claiming that none of the relevant cameras were working. Some frames from station CCTV cameras have been released, which show the alleged bombers, although their authenticity and relevance is disputed.
  
 +
==Uncertain/disputed footage==
 +
[[Global Research]] has questioned the authenticity of stills from the 2016 [[Mass murder in Brussels]] CCTV - the entire video has not been released.<ref>http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-fake-video-reports-of-the-brussels-terror-attacks/5516074</ref>
 
{{SMWDocs}}
 
{{SMWDocs}}
  

Revision as of 13:45, 25 March 2016

Concept.png CCTV
(mass surveillance)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png 5
CCTV.jpg

Official narrative

CCTV is originally about monitoring people for their own sake. Crime prevention is a key driver behind the implementation of CCTV cameras.

Problems

The "the total failure of CCTV to deter people from committing crimes in the first place"[1] has not deterred the ever wider deployment of CCTV, suggesting that other motives might be driving this technological roll out.

Control

CCTV evidence, although it could be made publicly available, for example, by being live streamed to the internet, is generally under the control of the few who set up the systems. Even where these are public authorities, spending public money and nominally acting for the good of the public because it is controlled by a central authority, the footage tends to remain under tight control, only released on an ad hoc basis when it suits the purposes of those who set up the cameras.

'Missing CCTV' footage

The widespread use of CCTV could provide valuable evidence in the case of acts of terrorism, though it is more notable for is absence in this respect. Specifically, in the following instances:

  • 1995: Oklahoma City bombing - In response to a FOIA request, the FBI claims to have lost the tapes of the OKC bombing[2][3]
  • 1997: Diana Princess of Wales/Death - No CCTV footage of the crash has been made available. It is unclear whether any exists.
  • 2001: 9-11/Pentagon - The FBI moved quickly to confiscate all CCTV footage from nearby cameras for reasons of "National security". None has ever been released. Of the Pentagon's (presumably many) CCTV cameras, footage from only a single camera has been released[When?] - and that is missing a crucial frame.
  • 2005: 7 July 2005 London bombings - Verint systems took control of London Transport's CCTV 10 months before the attacks, and have never released any footage, claiming that none of the relevant cameras were working. Some frames from station CCTV cameras have been released, which show the alleged bombers, although their authenticity and relevance is disputed.

Uncertain/disputed footage

Global Research has questioned the authenticity of stills from the 2016 Mass murder in Brussels CCTV - the entire video has not been released.[4]


Rating

5star.png 26 April 2022 Robin  A very useful collection of pointers to the deceitful ways in which CCTV is used
A very short page, but one with many links to deep events in which CCTV footage was unavailable, lost or falsified.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.



References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.