Biological weapon/Research

From Wikispooks
< Biological weapon
Revision as of 14:29, 25 March 2019 by Robin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{concept |wikipedia= |image= |constitutes=research |interests=Bioweapons }} '''Research into bioweapons''' is ongoing. ==Legal status== It is illegal to research ''offen...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Concept.png Biological weapon/Research
(research)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
Interest of• Danielle Anderson
• Ralph Baric
• Peter Daszak
• EcoHealth Alliance
• Anthony Fauci
• Bill Gates
• Wuhan Institute of Virology

Research into bioweapons is ongoing.

Legal status

It is illegal to research offensive bioweapons.

In practice, this restriction means nothing, since -- apart from the veil of secrecy surrounding such activities, the research of new offensive weapons can be explained as a first step to development of research into how to defend against them.

Privatisation

Full article: Privatisation

Privatisation has decreased the transparency associated with this area.

 

Examples

Page nameDescription
CRISPR gene editingBreakthrough technology making gene editing easy and fast.
DEFUSEA rejected proposal from Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance to weaponise naturally occuring bat coronaviruses, to preempt "zoonotic spillover". Authenticity questionable.
Genetic Extinction Technology
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Operation CauldronOffshore test of biological weapons.

 

Related Quotation

PageQuoteAuthorDate
Sasha Latypova“The perpetrators desperately, at all cost, need you to to believe that "mutating viruses in a lab" achieves some scary result, that then can be "leaked". That anyone can do it, even a PhD student in their garage. That our enemies are doing it and will "release" a super scary bug any time now, unless the Government is "prepared" by making a stockpile of "predictive vaccines" that can be deployed in DAYS after a new scary virus is detected in China. Or Timbuktu.

It is, however, a narrative. There is no way to "mutate viruses" in a lab in the way they all imply - to artificially make them deadlier and more transmissible at the same time. This is a propaganda fairytale with a very specific goal. You should be very concerned about any person (on "their" side or "ours") who repeats it with a serious face.

Sure, scientists can experiment with soups of DNA/RNA and grow things in petri dishes. They can design mutations on the computer and try to make concoctions of things. Are those "viruses" that can "leak from the lab" and "infect the world"? No. The proof of this is that while there are 1000 biolabs in the US and Western world playing with viruses. no pandemics or epidemics have resulted from these activities.”
Sasha Latypova27 January 2023

 

Related Documents

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
Document:Bioterror: Manufacturing Wars The American Wayforeword1 April 2003William H. Schaap
Ellen Ray
Document:Was there a Wuhan lab leak?blog post1 June 2021Jonathan CookNo meaningful lessons will be learnt about what really happened in Wuhan. Maintaining the illusion of truth will continue to take precedence over uncovering the truth. And for that reason we are doomed to keep making the same screw-ups. As the next pandemic will doubtless attest.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.