BBC/Terrorism reporting

BBC/Terrorism reporting

Official narrative

The BBC Editorial Guidelines on Terrorism state that:

“We must report acts of terror quickly, accurately, fully and responsibly. Our credibility is undermined by the careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgements. The word "terrorist" itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding. We should try to avoid the term, without attribution. We should let other people characterise while we report the facts as we know them.

We should not adopt other people's language as our own. It is also usually inappropriate to use words like "liberate", "court martial" or "execute" in the absence of a clear judicial process. We should convey to our audience the full consequences of the act by describing what happened. We should use words which specifically describe the perpetrator such as "bomber", "attacker", "gunman", "kidnapper", "insurgent, and "militant". Our responsibility is to remain objective and report in ways that enable our audiences to make their own assessments about who is doing what to whom.”

Concerns

Since the excellent film by Alan Francovich about Operation Gladio, the BBC has said almost nothing about false flag attacks. Since there is plentiful evidence that these make up an ever larger proportion of the incidents of "terrorism", this is in stark contrast to their above stated policy.

BBC TV Coverage of "Terrorism"

Comparison of BBC and ITN/Channel 4 news items on Terrorism 2000 - 2006.
Click for larger image

The graph on the right shows the percentage of items on "terrorism" returned during quarterly periods between 2000 and 2006 on the BBC compared with ITN and Channel 4. The graph apparently shows an increase following attacks in New York, Madrid and London, and the Israeli-Lebanon war. It also shows a marked increase in BBC items on "terrorism" at the end of 2002 and beginning of 2003 which is not apparent in ITN and Channel 4 coverage.

Security correspondents

"Terrorism" is usually dealt with by the BBC's security correspondents, primarily Frank Gardner and Gordon Corera. Brian Rowan, has also been described as the BBC's Northern Irelend Security Correspondent, and has performed a similar role in relation to the Northern Ireland conflict.

Use of external experts

The table below shows the 20 "terrorism experts" who made the most appearance on BBC television between January 2000 and December 2007. 435 names from a list of terrorism experts were searched at the archives of the BBC Motion Gallery for appearances on BBC News and BBC Current Affairs programmes. Only appearances relating to terrorism were recorded. The table is arranged according to the total number of items returned, and then alphabetically according to surname.

The table also shows the known affiliations of each expert as indicated by a mark in the columns labelled A-F. It shows that of the 20 top experts consulted by BBC television, 13 have worked in government or law enforcement, and six of the seven who have not, are affiliated to private think-tanks or private security companies. Only the Observer journalist Jason Burke has no such affiliation.

Terror Experts
Column A: Tenure at academic institution
Column B: Employee of Private Security/Intelligence firm
Column C: Member of government or law enforcement agency
Column D: Member of military or intelligence services
Column E: Member of private think-tanks or research institute
Column F: Media employee or independent journalist (not including contract work)
No.	Name of Expert	No. of Items	A	B	C	D	E	F
1	Michael Clarke	69	×				×
2=	Peter Clarke	66			×
2=	Crispin Black	66		×		×
4	Dan Plesch	60	×				×
5	M. J. Gohel	49		×
6	Charles Shoebridge	35		×	×	×
7	Patrick Mercer	20				×		×
8=	Richard Clarke	19			×
8=	Michael Dewar	19				×	×
10	Anthony Cordesman	16	×		×		×
11=	John O'Connor	15			×
11=	Sajjan Gohel	15		×
13=	Benjamin Netanyahu	14			×
13=	Sally Leivesley	14		×	×
13=	David Veness	14			×
16	Jason Burke	13						×
17=	Peter Power	12		×	×
17=	Mustafa Alani	12					×
17=	Bill Durodie	12	×				×
20	Paul Wilkinson	9	×			×	×

Remuneration of terrorism experts

Asked about the BBC’s relationship with experts and commentators on ""terrorism]"], security, and intelligence matters, BBC News Head of Editorial Compliance sent the following reply:</br></br>BBC News does not retain any experts and commentators on terrorism, security and intelligence matters on contract. We do sometimes pay a disturbance fee to contributors who make their living from selling their expertise (such as journalists, academics and members of think tanks) but many commentators do not ask for or expect any fee. Where payments are made, radio programmes, like “Today”, have a flat rate of £50. There is occasionally scope to exercise discretion, but it would be on a case by case basis. In daily Television News we have a basic disturbance fee of £50. This can be negotiable in certain circumstances, usually to an upper limit of £75. However, if we ask an interviewee to stay on set for longer periods (e.g. as a "presenter's friend") we will pay more, up to £350 for a five hour period, for example.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000003-QINU`"'</br>[[Has fullPageName" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid.

Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.