Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arms deal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Disagree (mild). I took a day to think this over, and I still have a mild preference for keeping them separate; I made this page as a place to list arms deals, as distinct from the trade in general. Contentwise, both pages ''are'' pretty short, so I see the case for merging them. We can always split it later as and when more content arrives. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC) | :Disagree (mild). I took a day to think this over, and I still have a mild preference for keeping them separate; I made this page as a place to list arms deals, as distinct from the trade in general. Contentwise, both pages ''are'' pretty short, so I see the case for merging them. We can always split it later as and when more content arrives. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: See the point, keep separate then. -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 21:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:47, 22 September 2024
Should this be merged with Arms trade? -- Sunvalley (talk) 21:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, under Arms trade. Terje (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Disagree (mild). I took a day to think this over, and I still have a mild preference for keeping them separate; I made this page as a place to list arms deals, as distinct from the trade in general. Contentwise, both pages are pretty short, so I see the case for merging them. We can always split it later as and when more content arrives. -- Robin (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)