Difference between revisions of "Project Iris"
(Extra image) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|image=Operation Iris.png | |image=Operation Iris.png | ||
|image_width=480px | |image_width=480px | ||
| − | |image_caption=A | + | |image_caption=A Snapshot from the [[Harod Associates]] report |
|locations= | |locations= | ||
|URL= | |URL= | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
"'''Project Iris'''" is a reference used by [[Harod Associates]] on a report for [[Greg Rowett]] of the [[Institute for Statecraft]]. | "'''Project Iris'''" is a reference used by [[Harod Associates]] on a report for [[Greg Rowett]] of the [[Institute for Statecraft]]. | ||
| + | [[image:Operation Iris_TOC.png|left|444px]] | ||
[[image:Operation Iris_2.png|left|444px]] | [[image:Operation Iris_2.png|left|444px]] | ||
==Report proposal== | ==Report proposal== | ||
| − | On 15<sup>th</sup> March 2018 an unidentified party send a proposal to Greg Rowett to commission a 2 phase report "to study [[social media]] activity in respect of the events that took place, how news spread and evaluate how the incident is being perceived in the [[UK]], [[USA]], [[France]], [[Germany]] and [[Russia]]." The cost of the first phase was put at £7,500 - £10,000. The second phase, regular monitoring, was £200/day, £1,300 per week & £3,000 per month (plus VAT). This is detailed in a document released in tranche 3 of the | + | On 15<sup>th</sup> March 2018 an unidentified party send a proposal to Greg Rowett to commission a 2 phase report "to study [[social media]] activity in respect of the events that took place, how news spread and evaluate how the incident is being perceived in the [[UK]], [[USA]], [[France]], [[Germany]] and [[Russia]]." The cost of the first phase was put at £7,500 - £10,000. The second phase, regular monitoring, was £200/day, £1,300 per week & £3,000 per month (plus VAT). This is detailed in a document released in [[tranche 3 of the Integrity Initiative Leak]].<ref name=ii3>[[Integrity Initiative/Leak/3#skripal/150318 IOS Proposal[1293].pdf]]</ref> |
[[image:Operation Iris_3.png|left|444px]] | [[image:Operation Iris_3.png|left|444px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:32, 23 July 2021
 A Snapshot from the Harod Associates report | |
| Interests | social media |
|---|---|
| Description | A reference used by Harod Associates on a report into public perceptions of the Skripal Affair |
"Project Iris" is a reference used by Harod Associates on a report for Greg Rowett of the Institute for Statecraft.
Contents
Report proposal
On 15th March 2018 an unidentified party send a proposal to Greg Rowett to commission a 2 phase report "to study social media activity in respect of the events that took place, how news spread and evaluate how the incident is being perceived in the UK, USA, France, Germany and Russia." The cost of the first phase was put at £7,500 - £10,000. The second phase, regular monitoring, was £200/day, £1,300 per week & £3,000 per month (plus VAT). This is detailed in a document released in tranche 3 of the Integrity Initiative Leak.[1]
Invoice
Harod Associates invoice #1535, for £10,000 + VAT was issued on 27 March 2018 for "Specialist Consultancy Services as agreed with Guy Spindler".
Exposure
This was revealed by Integrity Initiative Leak 4. The invoice was revealed by Integrity Initiative Leak 3.
References
- ↑ [[Integrity Initiative/Leak/3#skripal/150318 IOS Proposal[1293].pdf]]
