Difference between revisions of "Document:CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016"
m (tidying) |
m (typo) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Document | {{Document | ||
− | |title=CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016 | + | |title=CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016 |
− | |type= ' | + | |type=schedule |
− | |authors=Integrity Initiative | + | |description=Donnelly's travel itinerary to Oslo + meeting how to create cell in Norway |
+ | |authors=Integrity Initiative | ||
|leaked=Yes | |leaked=Yes | ||
|publication_date=26 December 2018 | |publication_date=26 December 2018 | ||
|source_name=Anonymous | |source_name=Anonymous | ||
|source_URL=https://www.cyberguerrilla.org/blog/operation-integrity-initiative-british-informational-war-against-all-part-4/ | |source_URL=https://www.cyberguerrilla.org/blog/operation-integrity-initiative-british-informational-war-against-all-part-4/ | ||
− | | | + | |subjects= Norway, Aftenposten, Institute for Defence Studies, Barents Observer,Northern Norway |
− | |||
|constitutes=Integrity Initiative/Leak/4 | |constitutes=Integrity Initiative/Leak/4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | [[Chris Donnelly|CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016 | |
− | CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016 | ||
==Programme== | ==Programme== | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
29 August | 29 August | ||
− | 1730 -1900 Meeting with Cecilie Prebensen and E Africa team, National Youth Council, re Daesh info and the radicalisation of youth | + | 1730 -1900 Meeting with [[Cecilie Prebensen]] and E Africa team, National Youth Council, re Daesh info and the [[radicalisation]] of youth |
− | 1930 Dinner meeting with Chris Prebensen and Sven Ullring (former Chairman of Fridtjof Nansen Institute) on getting the Norwegians’ attention | + | 1930 Dinner meeting with [[Chris Prebensen]] and [[Sven Ullring]] (former [[Chairman of Fridtjof Nansen Institute]]) on getting the Norwegians’ attention |
30 August | 30 August | ||
− | 1000 – 1130 Discussion with Kristin Ven Bruusgård Institute for Defence Studies, MOD (kvbruusgaard@ifs.mil.no) on Russian infowar and hybrid war | + | 1000 – 1130 Discussion with [[Kristin Ven Bruusgård]] [[Institute for Defence Studies]], MOD (kvbruusgaard@ifs.mil.no) on Russian infowar and hybrid war |
− | 1130 - 1300 Seminar at the Norwegian Atlantic Committee, Chair – Secretary General Kate Hansen Bundt (bundt@dnak.org): speakers - Kristin Ven Bruussgård and Chris Donnelly; From Cold War to Hot Peace, Russia’s tools of influence and information warfare | + | 1130 - 1300 Seminar at the Norwegian Atlantic Committee, Chair – Secretary General [[Kate Hansen Bundt]] (bundt@dnak.org): speakers - [[Kristin Ven Bruussgård]] and [[Chris Donnelly]]; From Cold War to Hot Peace, Russia’s tools of influence and information warfare |
− | 1330- 1530 Informal Workshop on Fighting the Information War, Chair - Henning-Andre Sogaard, Defence Research Institute, MOD (Henning-Andre.Sogaard@ffi.no). | + | 1330- 1530 Informal Workshop on Fighting the Information War, Chair - [[Henning-Andre Sogaard]], Defence Research Institute, MOD (Henning-Andre.Sogaard@ffi.no). |
Intro by Chris Donnelly about the Integrity Initiative background and concept: | Intro by Chris Donnelly about the Integrity Initiative background and concept: | ||
− | The first workshop in Brussels 22 June, conclusions and lessons learned; where will the international project go from here. | + | The first workshop in [[Brussels]] 22 June, conclusions and lessons learned; where will the international project go from here. |
General discussion as to how this can be generated in Norway nationally, acros Nordic states, and Internationlly. Building the cooperation between the classified and unclassified world, keeping in mind that one of the main targets is the hearts and minds of the public. | General discussion as to how this can be generated in Norway nationally, acros Nordic states, and Internationlly. Building the cooperation between the classified and unclassified world, keeping in mind that one of the main targets is the hearts and minds of the public. | ||
− | 1600-1800 Meeting with Tor Bukkvoll, Defence Research Institute (tor.bukkvoll@ffi.no) on info war as an element of the Ukraine conflict. | + | 1600-1800 Meeting with [[Tor Bukkvoll]], Defence Research Institute (tor.bukkvoll@ffi.no) on info war as an element of the Ukraine conflict. |
1900 Working dinner to summarize and plan the way forward. | 1900 Working dinner to summarize and plan the way forward. | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
31 August | 31 August | ||
− | 1000 Meeting to discuss countering radicalisation with Superintendent Andreas Corvalan, Oslo Police, i/c radicalisation, and Jon Fitje Hoffman, Director Strategic Analysis, Police Security Service 1200 Meeting with Elin Solberg and Siv Syversen-Nordberg, responsible for counter-radicalisation at the Ministry of Justice | + | 1000 Meeting to discuss countering radicalisation with Superintendent [[Andreas Corvalan]], Oslo Police, i/c radicalisation, and [[Jon Fitje Hoffman]], Director Strategic Analysis, Police Security Service 1200 Meeting with [[Elin Solberg]] and [[Siv Syversen-Nordberg]], responsible for counter-radicalisation at the Ministry of Justice |
− | 1330 Chris Prebensen: next steps re creating in Norway an education process on Russian influence and disinformation | + | 1330 [[Chris Prebensen]]: next steps re creating in [[Norway]] an education process on Russian influence and disinformation |
==The current situation in Norway== | ==The current situation in Norway== | ||
Line 48: | Line 47: | ||
* The community of those in Norway across government and outside government studying Russia, hybrid warfare, info & influence etc. Do not often get together to exchange ideas. | * The community of those in Norway across government and outside government studying Russia, hybrid warfare, info & influence etc. Do not often get together to exchange ideas. | ||
− | * A lot of good work on disinformation and influence from Russia is being done in Governmental bodies (PST, Int Svce, Institute for Defence Studies, Communications Security, Civil Preparedness Directorate). But there is very little effective transmission of this to the | + | * A lot of good work on disinformation and influence from [[Russia]] is being done in Governmental bodies ([[PST]], [[Norwegian Intelligence Service|Int Svce]], [[Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies|Institute for Defence Studies]], Communications Security, [[Civil Preparedness Directorate]]). But there is very little effective transmission of this to the press, acadaemia and public understanding. |
− | press, acadaemia and public understanding. | ||
− | * There is even a sense in some quarters (military, political, public) that, because Oslo is not one of | + | * There is even a sense in some quarters (military, political, public) that, because [[Oslo]] is not one of [[Russia]]’s main direct [[disinformation]] targets, this issue is not so important. This fails to recognise that Norway would be seriously affected by Russian influence on Allies, and ignores what is happening in the North and in other [[Nordic countries]]. |
* The Norwegian public are generally inclined to be soft on Russia as a near neighbour in the North (where there is a tradition of freindship and a good working relationship). Although the public can be hard-nosed about Putin and Moscow’s policies, their scepticism of US/western politics can lead to their being less critical of Russia’s position at times. | * The Norwegian public are generally inclined to be soft on Russia as a near neighbour in the North (where there is a tradition of freindship and a good working relationship). Although the public can be hard-nosed about Putin and Moscow’s policies, their scepticism of US/western politics can lead to their being less critical of Russia’s position at times. | ||
Line 57: | Line 55: | ||
Norwegian journalists tend to give Russian information the same weight as western information, not testing its veracity. The essential strategic balance between working with Russia on mutually important issues and standing up to pressure from Russia is not always maintained. | Norwegian journalists tend to give Russian information the same weight as western information, not testing its veracity. The essential strategic balance between working with Russia on mutually important issues and standing up to pressure from Russia is not always maintained. | ||
− | * Since 2013, less detailed attention has been given to the High North and Russia’s increasing military presence. Since 2015 there has been a neglecting of the valuable information opportunity provided by The Barents Observer, the Independent Barents | + | * {{SMWQ|subjects=Northern Norway,Svalbard||format=inline||quote_marks=0|||source_URL=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:CND_Integrity_Initiative_visit_to_Oslo,_29-31_Aug_2016|text=Since 2013, less detailed attention has been given to the High North and Russia’s increasing military presence. Since 2015 there has been a neglecting of the valuable information opportunity provided by [[The Barents Observer]], the [[Independent Barents Council]]’s proven means for transmitting straight news and information to Russian audiences both within Russia (as far as Moscow) and to Russians now resident in North Norway (currently 25% of the poulation of the three northen counties). |
− | * There is now growing governmental concern about Russian influence (a) on the population in North Norway and (b) on international opinion concerning the High North sea route and the status of Svalbard. Moreover, Norwegians working in Northern Russia are now experiencing pressure and harassment from the FSB and finding the authorities generally much more antagonistic. | + | * There is now growing governmental concern about Russian influence (a) on the population in [[North Norway]] and (b) on international opinion concerning the [[High North sea route]] and the status of [[Svalbard]]. Moreover, Norwegians working in Northern Russia are now experiencing pressure and harassment from the FSB and finding the authorities generally much more antagonistic.}} |
==Next steps== | ==Next steps== | ||
− | * Follow up by exploiting Ben | + | * Follow up by exploiting [[Ben Nimmo]]’s visit to [[Oslo]] to talk to the army at the end of September by arraging a follow up talk to an Atlantic Committee audience. |
* Identify and bring to this talk a group of interested, competent Norwegians as the basis for a new network to become de facto part of the Integrity Initiative. Find someone prepared to coordinate this local network. | * Identify and bring to this talk a group of interested, competent Norwegians as the basis for a new network to become de facto part of the Integrity Initiative. Find someone prepared to coordinate this local network. | ||
Line 73: | Line 71: | ||
* Publicise what Russian influence is doing in other countries (Allies on which Norway relies) and what other countries are doing about it. | * Publicise what Russian influence is doing in other countries (Allies on which Norway relies) and what other countries are doing about it. | ||
− | * Approach influential journalists to pick up this story and educate the public (e.g. Aftenposten; Per Anders Johansson, Moscow correspondent, or, more likely, Per Christian Aale, who heads the European desk). Improve the integrity of Norwegian journalists and encourage their competence and willingness to challenge information sources. Approach academics to track and expose the Russian distortion of history. | + | * Approach influential journalists to pick up this story and educate the public (e.g. [[Aftenposten]]; [[Per Anders Johansson]], Moscow correspondent, or, more likely, [[Per Christian Aale]], who heads the European desk). Improve the integrity of Norwegian journalists and encourage their competence and willingness to challenge information sources. Approach academics to track and expose the Russian distortion of history. |
− | * Recognise that there are Russians who oppose Putin and want a democratic Russia, and need us to provide them with information. Focus first on the three northern counties and the High North and help revive the Barents Observer. | + | * Recognise that there are Russians who oppose [[Putin]] and want a democratic Russia, and need us to provide them with information. Focus first on the three northern counties and the High North and help revive the Barents Observer. |
Latest revision as of 07:10, 9 February 2023
Donnelly's travel itinerary to Oslo + meeting how to create cell in Norway |
![Disclaimer (#3)](/w/images/thumb/6/69/I.png/25px-I.png)
![Document.png](/w/images/thumb/5/5e/Document.png/26px-Document.png)
Subjects: Norway, Aftenposten, Institute for Defence Studies, Barents Observer, Northern Norway
Example of: Integrity Initiative/Leak/4
Source: Anonymous (Link)
★ Start a Discussion about this document
CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016
[[Chris Donnelly|CND Integrity Initiative visit to Oslo, 29-31 Aug 2016
Programme
29 August
1730 -1900 Meeting with Cecilie Prebensen and E Africa team, National Youth Council, re Daesh info and the radicalisation of youth
1930 Dinner meeting with Chris Prebensen and Sven Ullring (former Chairman of Fridtjof Nansen Institute) on getting the Norwegians’ attention
30 August 1000 – 1130 Discussion with Kristin Ven Bruusgård Institute for Defence Studies, MOD (kvbruusgaard@ifs.mil.no) on Russian infowar and hybrid war
1130 - 1300 Seminar at the Norwegian Atlantic Committee, Chair – Secretary General Kate Hansen Bundt (bundt@dnak.org): speakers - Kristin Ven Bruussgård and Chris Donnelly; From Cold War to Hot Peace, Russia’s tools of influence and information warfare
1330- 1530 Informal Workshop on Fighting the Information War, Chair - Henning-Andre Sogaard, Defence Research Institute, MOD (Henning-Andre.Sogaard@ffi.no).
Intro by Chris Donnelly about the Integrity Initiative background and concept:
The first workshop in Brussels 22 June, conclusions and lessons learned; where will the international project go from here.
General discussion as to how this can be generated in Norway nationally, acros Nordic states, and Internationlly. Building the cooperation between the classified and unclassified world, keeping in mind that one of the main targets is the hearts and minds of the public. 1600-1800 Meeting with Tor Bukkvoll, Defence Research Institute (tor.bukkvoll@ffi.no) on info war as an element of the Ukraine conflict.
1900 Working dinner to summarize and plan the way forward.
31 August
1000 Meeting to discuss countering radicalisation with Superintendent Andreas Corvalan, Oslo Police, i/c radicalisation, and Jon Fitje Hoffman, Director Strategic Analysis, Police Security Service 1200 Meeting with Elin Solberg and Siv Syversen-Nordberg, responsible for counter-radicalisation at the Ministry of Justice
1330 Chris Prebensen: next steps re creating in Norway an education process on Russian influence and disinformation
The current situation in Norway
- The community of those in Norway across government and outside government studying Russia, hybrid warfare, info & influence etc. Do not often get together to exchange ideas.
- A lot of good work on disinformation and influence from Russia is being done in Governmental bodies (PST, Int Svce, Institute for Defence Studies, Communications Security, Civil Preparedness Directorate). But there is very little effective transmission of this to the press, acadaemia and public understanding.
- There is even a sense in some quarters (military, political, public) that, because Oslo is not one of Russia’s main direct disinformation targets, this issue is not so important. This fails to recognise that Norway would be seriously affected by Russian influence on Allies, and ignores what is happening in the North and in other Nordic countries.
- The Norwegian public are generally inclined to be soft on Russia as a near neighbour in the North (where there is a tradition of freindship and a good working relationship). Although the public can be hard-nosed about Putin and Moscow’s policies, their scepticism of US/western politics can lead to their being less critical of Russia’s position at times.
Norwegian journalists tend to give Russian information the same weight as western information, not testing its veracity. The essential strategic balance between working with Russia on mutually important issues and standing up to pressure from Russia is not always maintained.
- Since 2013, less detailed attention has been given to the High North and Russia’s increasing military presence. Since 2015 there has been a neglecting of the valuable information opportunity provided by The Barents Observer, the Independent Barents Council’s proven means for transmitting straight news and information to Russian audiences both within Russia (as far as Moscow) and to Russians now resident in North Norway (currently 25% of the poulation of the three northen counties).
- There is now growing governmental concern about Russian influence (a) on the population in North Norway and (b) on international opinion concerning the High North sea route and the status of Svalbard. Moreover, Norwegians working in Northern Russia are now experiencing pressure and harassment from the FSB and finding the authorities generally much more antagonistic. [1]
Next steps
- Follow up by exploiting Ben Nimmo’s visit to Oslo to talk to the army at the end of September by arraging a follow up talk to an Atlantic Committee audience.
- Identify and bring to this talk a group of interested, competent Norwegians as the basis for a new network to become de facto part of the Integrity Initiative. Find someone prepared to coordinate this local network.
- Identify who can write papers on this issue for publication locally and as part of our Integrity network. Stimulate a series of papers.
- Put pressure on governmental bodies to share information, help open source exploitation and improve dissemination.
- Publicise what Russian influence is doing in other countries (Allies on which Norway relies) and what other countries are doing about it.
- Approach influential journalists to pick up this story and educate the public (e.g. Aftenposten; Per Anders Johansson, Moscow correspondent, or, more likely, Per Christian Aale, who heads the European desk). Improve the integrity of Norwegian journalists and encourage their competence and willingness to challenge information sources. Approach academics to track and expose the Russian distortion of history.
- Recognise that there are Russians who oppose Putin and want a democratic Russia, and need us to provide them with information. Focus first on the three northern counties and the High North and help revive the Barents Observer.