Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (reply)
(Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
::Thanks Patrick. However, I can see no objection to that appearing lower down in the page as an interesting tit-bit of info about an important issue facing the page subject.  --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
 
::Thanks Patrick. However, I can see no objection to that appearing lower down in the page as an interesting tit-bit of info about an important issue facing the page subject.  --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
 +
 +
:::Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section.--[[User:Patrick Haseldine|Patrick Haseldine]] ([[User talk:Patrick Haseldine|talk]]) 17:54, 24 February 2014 (GMT)

Latest revision as of 17:54, 24 February 2014

The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of Pik Botha does not belong in the Lede. This really is a matter of principle and is applicable to other pages too. Important though Lockerbie is, it is a relatively minor part of the corpus of issues and responsibilities of this page subject. I appreciate Lockerbie assumes a greater importance in the context of Wikispooks' preoccupations but even here it is not the dominant one. --Peter P (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2014 (GMT)

The reference to Lockerbie and the prosecution of Pik Botha now removed from the lede.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 17:04, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
Thanks Patrick. However, I can see no objection to that appearing lower down in the page as an interesting tit-bit of info about an important issue facing the page subject. --Peter P (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2014 (GMT)
Tit-bit added to the "Prosecution of crimes" section.--Patrick Haseldine (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2014 (GMT)