Difference between revisions of "Psychopathy/Psychopathy and gender"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(|description=)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{concept
 
{{concept
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
|constitutes=personality disorder, character disturbance  
+
|constitutes=personality disorder, character disturbance
 +
|description=If disguised as "caring" or "mothering", female styles are hard to detect.
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 18: Line 19:
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
Anna Motz. The psychology of female violence: Crimes against the body. Routledge, 2016.
+
Anna Motz. The psychology of female violence. Second Edition. Routledge, 2016.
http://files.bibliotekata.webnode.com/200000043-38e7f39e0f/Female Violence.pdf
+
avail. online.  
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
[[Munchausen by proxy]] mothers are an example for this behavior.
+
{{SMWQ
 +
|text=For mothers, presenting the facade of ordinary, devoted maternal care provides
 +
an invaluable subterfuge for abuse.
 +
|subjects=Psychopathy
 +
|authors=Anna Motz
 +
|source_details=p. 18
 +
|source_URL=
 +
|source_name=Anna Motz. The psychology of female violence.
 +
|date=2016
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
[[Psychopathy/Munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy|Munchausen by proxy mothers]] are an example for this behavior.  
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
 
Schreier H., Libow J., Hurting for Love - Munchausen syndrome by proxy, Guilford, London 1993  
 
Schreier H., Libow J., Hurting for Love - Munchausen syndrome by proxy, Guilford, London 1993  
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
 +
Female psychopathy is hidden from justice and detection because toddlers won't tell and the [[Stockholm_syndrome|traumatizing effects]]
 +
<ref>
 +
Brett Kahr, PhD, "When mummy wants you to die": unconscious death
 +
wishes and the infanticidal attachment, lectcure, 26 November, 2016, Bowlby Centre, London
 +
</ref>
 +
ensure that adult survivors won't tell either. This invincibility, power and control (over future generations) enforces the pathological grandiose self and ''contemptuous delight'' in getting away with it.
 +
 +
That is not to say that female forms are limited to women - gender identity is diffuse anyway in psychopathy
 +
<ref name=meloy1>
 +
Meloy, J. Reid, Ph.D.,
 +
The psychopathic mind: origins, dynamics, and treatment, Jason Aronson 2002. available online.
 +
</ref>
 +
- i.e. [[Bill Gates]] presents himself as "caring" despite his track record of wracking havoc with [[Monsanto]] seeds (in India) and [[vaccines]] (in Africa). 
  
The research of female psychopathic personalities has been avoided by psychologist, from [[Sigmund Freud]] to [[Robert Hare]]. Typical female aggressive styles (triangulation, ostracism, mortification, invalidation) have been researched.  
+
The research of female psychopathic personalities has been avoided by psychologists, from [[Sigmund Freud]] to [[Robert Hare]], probably because it touches on their own internal working models (IWM
 +
<ref>
 +
Sachs Simpson, Adah (2014) The abused and the abuser(s): attachment relationship in dissociative identity disorder. Doctoral thesis (PhD), Manchester
 +
Metropolitan University. avail. online.
 +
</ref>
 +
). Typical female aggressive styles (triangulation, ostracism, gossiping, indirect, well hidden forms) have been researched.  
 
<ref>
 
<ref>
 
Kaj Björkqvist. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex roles, 30(3-4):177–188, 1994.
 
Kaj Björkqvist. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex roles, 30(3-4):177–188, 1994.

Latest revision as of 08:03, 27 April 2021

Concept.png Psychopathy/Psychopathy and gender 
(personality disorder,  character disturbance)Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
If disguised as "caring" or "mothering", female styles are hard to detect.

It is inconceivable to most people and the public at large that mothers may act cold and heartless toward their newborn infants. The logical mind of female psychopaths recognizes this cultural myth as weakness and seeks to exploit it. [1]

They play-act like caring mothers when in fact they do not feel anything or not much in general - at least no positive feelings like love or gratitude - while hurting their infants without conscience, empathy or remorse to make them dependent pawns in their own game and selfishly exploit them. The arena for female psychopathy is the perversion of motherhood and child raring. [2] [3] [4]

“For mothers, presenting the facade of ordinary, devoted maternal care provides an invaluable subterfuge for abuse.”
Anna Motz (2016)  [5]

Munchausen by proxy mothers are an example for this behavior. [6] Female psychopathy is hidden from justice and detection because toddlers won't tell and the traumatizing effects [7] ensure that adult survivors won't tell either. This invincibility, power and control (over future generations) enforces the pathological grandiose self and contemptuous delight in getting away with it.

That is not to say that female forms are limited to women - gender identity is diffuse anyway in psychopathy [8] - i.e. Bill Gates presents himself as "caring" despite his track record of wracking havoc with Monsanto seeds (in India) and vaccines (in Africa).

The research of female psychopathic personalities has been avoided by psychologists, from Sigmund Freud to Robert Hare, probably because it touches on their own internal working models (IWM [9] ). Typical female aggressive styles (triangulation, ostracism, gossiping, indirect, well hidden forms) have been researched. [10] [11]



Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References

  1. Frank S Perri and Terrance G Lichtenwald. The last frontier: Myths & the female psychopathic killer. Forensic Examiner, 19(2):50–67, 2010. https://www.academia.edu/1636859/The_Last_Frontier_Myths_and_the_Female_Psychopathic_Killer
  2. Benecke L., Psychopathinnen, Lübbe, Köln 2018
  3. Welldon E.V. (2017) No Longer a Taboo: Understanding Female Perversion in Motherhood. In: Caine D., Wright C. (eds) Perversion Now!. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47271-3_14
  4. Anna Motz. The psychology of female violence. Second Edition. Routledge, 2016. avail. online.
  5. Anna Motz. The psychology of female violence. p. 18
  6. Schreier H., Libow J., Hurting for Love - Munchausen syndrome by proxy, Guilford, London 1993
  7. Brett Kahr, PhD, "When mummy wants you to die": unconscious death wishes and the infanticidal attachment, lectcure, 26 November, 2016, Bowlby Centre, London
  8. Meloy, J. Reid, Ph.D., The psychopathic mind: origins, dynamics, and treatment, Jason Aronson 2002. available online.
  9. Sachs Simpson, Adah (2014) The abused and the abuser(s): attachment relationship in dissociative identity disorder. Doctoral thesis (PhD), Manchester Metropolitan University. avail. online.
  10. Kaj Björkqvist. Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex roles, 30(3-4):177–188, 1994. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kaj_Bjoerkqvist/publication/226959137_Sex_differences_in_physical_verbal_and_indirect_aggression_A_review_of_recent_research/links/09e4151132dafc5459000000/Sex-differences-in-physical-verbal-and-indirect-aggression-A-review-of-recent-research.pdf
  11. Kaj Björkqvist, Kirsti MJ Lagerspetz, and Ari Kaukiainen. Do girls manipulate and boys fight? developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive behavior, 18(2):117–127, 1992. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kaj_Bjoerkqvist/publication/246881750_Do_girls_manipulate_and_boys_fight_Develpmental_trends_in_regard_to_direct_and_indirect_aggression/links/5bea8472a6fdcc3a8dd1da44/Do-girls-manipulate-and-boys-fight-Develpmental-trends-in-regard-to-direct-and-indirect-aggression.pdf%